<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TWiV 65: Matt&#8217;s bats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/</link>
	<description>A netcast about viruses - the kind that make you sick</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TWiV 114: Ten out of &#8217;10</title>
		<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/comment-page-1/#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>TWiV 114: Ten out of &#8217;10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 00:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twiv.tv/?p=947#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>[...] XMRV, CFS, and prostate cancer (TWiV 113, 99, 98, 94, 89, 76, 70, 65) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] XMRV, CFS, and prostate cancer (TWiV 113, 99, 98, 94, 89, 76, 70, 65) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bats harbor many viral sequences</title>
		<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/comment-page-1/#comment-4109</link>
		<dc:creator>Bats harbor many viral sequences</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twiv.tv/?p=947#comment-4109</guid>
		<description>[...] *including Eric F. Donaldson and Matt Frieman, who spoke about this work on TWiV 90 and 65. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *including Eric F. Donaldson and Matt Frieman, who spoke about this work on TWiV 90 and 65. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teeny</title>
		<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/comment-page-1/#comment-2610</link>
		<dc:creator>Teeny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twiv.tv/?p=947#comment-2610</guid>
		<description>Just thought I&#039;d let you know - I&#039;m writing up my research manuscript while listening to your podcasts instead of music like the others, and as a consequence people in the lab think I&#039;m crazy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#39;d let you know &#8211; I&#39;m writing up my research manuscript while listening to your podcasts instead of music like the others, and as a consequence people in the lab think I&#39;m crazy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaronharmon80</title>
		<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/comment-page-1/#comment-2608</link>
		<dc:creator>aaronharmon80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twiv.tv/?p=947#comment-2608</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply. Their evidence is pretty convincing. I am surprised that this appears to be capable of expression, as the start codon and ploy A tail are intact.  Wouldn&#039;t this have disappeared over the ~50 million years? Unless it is conferring an advantage to the host, as endogenous retroviruses appear to do (in the case of limiting cell infectivity to new retroviruses).  Great article and discussion piece!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply. Their evidence is pretty convincing. I am surprised that this appears to be capable of expression, as the start codon and ploy A tail are intact.  Wouldn&#39;t this have disappeared over the ~50 million years? Unless it is conferring an advantage to the host, as endogenous retroviruses appear to do (in the case of limiting cell infectivity to new retroviruses).  Great article and discussion piece!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: profvrr</title>
		<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/comment-page-1/#comment-2606</link>
		<dc:creator>profvrr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twiv.tv/?p=947#comment-2606</guid>
		<description>Based on the sequence of the integrated bornavirus DNA, the authors&lt;br&gt;believe that the viral DNA originated from an ancient infection. The&lt;br&gt;integrated BDV DNA in chromosomal DNA is flanked by signature sequence&lt;br&gt;elements that are produced when mRNAs are copied by the reverse&lt;br&gt;transcriptase activity encoded by retrotransposons, such as long&lt;br&gt;interspersed nucleotide elements (LINEs). The authors conclude that&lt;br&gt;&#039;it is likely that EBLNs are processed pseudogenes derived from&lt;br&gt;ancient bornavirus infections.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the sequence of the integrated bornavirus DNA, the authors<br />believe that the viral DNA originated from an ancient infection. The<br />integrated BDV DNA in chromosomal DNA is flanked by signature sequence<br />elements that are produced when mRNAs are copied by the reverse<br />transcriptase activity encoded by retrotransposons, such as long<br />interspersed nucleotide elements (LINEs). The authors conclude that<br />&#39;it is likely that EBLNs are processed pseudogenes derived from<br />ancient bornavirus infections.&#39;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaronharmon80</title>
		<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>aaronharmon80</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twiv.tv/?p=947#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>I am curious about the discussion of Bornavirus DNA in mammalian genomes. Is it more possible that Bornavirus pulled the gene from a mammal. Similar to the apparent hijacking of genes from amoeba that Marseillevirus is suspected to have done. To me this seems more plausible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious about the discussion of Bornavirus DNA in mammalian genomes. Is it more possible that Bornavirus pulled the gene from a mammal. Similar to the apparent hijacking of genes from amoeba that Marseillevirus is suspected to have done. To me this seems more plausible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.twiv.tv/2010/01/10/twiv-65-matts-bats/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.twiv.tv/?p=947#comment-2604</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by profvrr: This Week in Virology episode 65 is up: Matt&#039;s bats http://bit.ly/5Ne6Xn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by profvrr: This Week in Virology episode 65 is up: Matt&#8217;s bats <a href="http://bit.ly/5Ne6Xn.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5Ne6Xn..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

